I was watching one of Chris Rock's comedy shows recently where he made a valid point
that women cannot go back materialistically.
What he meant by this simply is that women just won't fancy dating any guy who is
less financially buoyant than their last boyfriend and if they do, they won't be
'feeling' the other guy s much.
I've had conversations with two of my female room mates whose idea of their 'best
boyfriend ever' was the guy who spent on them, who got them the expensive stuff
and provided them with their heart's desires without them having to even ask. There
is nothing any female loves more than when her man gets her some item (be it a
shoe, a handbag, a phone etc) she's been pining for without her having to utter a
word about it to him. Example, if she's been posting a pic of a pair of shoes on her IG
or DP and her man asks why she's so interested in the shoe followed by her shoe size,
trust when I say the Shoki the babe will be dancing that day in anticipation of the
arrival of the shoes will be enough to send Lil Kesh out of business
Fellas, if you're looking to date a woman whose ex is responsible for half the shiiit in
her closet, plus the Samsung galaxy/Iphone she's currently using and you're not
loaded, I regret to inform you that you don enter one chance. As in, your own don
kpafuka. Like, she most likely will have the same interest in the relationship as the
average straight man has in an episode of The Kardashians
You want the truth? Well, here it is. You
may love her more than that ex did, you may be ready to sell your father's land in
the village to provide for her, but all of that will most likely pale in her eyes in
comparison to what the mofo ex has done for her.
Women tend to place their wants above their needs. Forget Nollywood movies bro,
you're not Ramsey Noah and she's not Genevieve, if she's with you despite the fact
that you're 'poorer' than her ex, then know that she's most likely just hanging around
until either the ex is released from whatever spiritual bondage that caused him to
break up with her or the Lord directs some other rich dude to her stable.
So I explained to one of the two girls that her ex isn't necessarily the best guy she'll
ever meet, he just happens to have the funds to express his love as opposed to some
other guy who may respect her more and generally be more loving, but is
unfortunately, not financially buoyant enough to show he's a better catch. In such
situations it's left to the woman to decide what she really wants in a relationship and
if she can survive with a man who may not be financially gifted, but possesses other
traits that in the long run would be much better than wealth
So on that note, I will agree with emusmith, that love isn't always enough in any
relationship, but not necessarily based on the terms he listed in his write-up, which in
all honesty, I found some vapid, petty and somewhat shallow (no offence ).
Sometimes the psychological make-up of a gender will come into play.
And before the men cry foul, Chris Rock also stated that men on the other hand, can
NOT go back Sexually....but I believe that's a topic for another day. Ciao
Post a Comment